As if dodging the bullet on Y2K, 9/11, the great polar icecap melt off of 2012, Maya Doom with their stone calendar ending in 2012, signalling the end of the age, and COVID and Democrat/Liberal Policy and forced waves of sketchily motivated illegal immigration were not enough, now we must try to survive cowfarts!  Can we rally and face an existential crisis one more time, oh ye Exhausted World?  Be strong!  Be brave!  And most important, fellow useless eaters...be very, very cynical and suspicious.  We must! 

 

***To give an example of just how loud the Liberal/Leftist/New World Order version of truth is being shoved down the world's throat compared to the Right Wing/Conservative/Judeo-Christian version of truth, consider this:  On June 12, 2026 I asked Gemini A.I. if Google had a left leaning bias or a right leaning bias.  The answer Gemini gave included the following statistical percentages:

• Google News Audits: According to an extensive multi-year tracking study by AllSides, Google News displays a distinct Lean Left bias. In their analysis of unpersonalized "Top Stories," 73% of the news outlets featured on Google's homepage were from left-leaning sources (such as The New York Times, CNN, and The Washington Post). Only 1% came from right-leaning outlets, with the remaining 25% coming from the Center. [1, 2, 3, 4]
• Academic Search Audits: Scientific research papers analyzing search engine behavior during elections have concluded that both Google and Bing inherently prioritize left-leaning media sources. This effect is magnified because mainstream legacy media outlets produce a vastly higher volume of indexed content than independent or niche conservative blogs. [1, 2]

         End Gemini quote.

     So, in this particular comparison of what they are calling 'unpersonalized Top stories' , Google, a highly utilized search engine by any measure, was analyzed as providing search results showing stories from left leaning sources 73% of the time, and from right leaning outlets 1% of the time?  In America our elections have shown something close to a 50% left leaning electorate and a 50% right leaning electorate.  So wouldn't they be aware that they are marginalizing the views of about half of America?  Yet we are fed information by Google search engine programming from left leaning sources 73% of the time, from the center 25% of the time, and from right leaning sources 1% of the time?  If so, that is monumentally lopsidedly in favor of the Left's pretty God-less messaging.  And Google has to be aware of this, don't they?  So, could they be purposely deciding to not rectify this disparity?  Are they working to steer public thinking to the left, because that's what appears to be happening.  If so, that is bad, because the Left is a destroyer of nations, in my opinion.  Heavily left leaning nations fail...they do not prosper!  What search engine company could financially benefit from the ultimate destruction of a nation in which they are located?  It is like allowing the purposeful poisoning of the very water in which you bathe...how can such a practice serve you?  Didn't Michael Jordan say that he doesn't take a political side with Democrats because 'Republicans buy tennis shoes too', or something similar.  That is good common sense on his part.  Search engines would also serve themselves well to work hard to stay as unpolarized as possible concerning the info they provide, shouldn't they?  Republicans and conservatives' search for information, too!'

 

     But on to 'cow farts':          

 

 

      Those poor cows, pigs, sheep and goats...you farm animals could keep what some of the New World Order (NWO) people call 'useless eaters' alive in hard times.  That's not part of the New World Order's plan.  When the grocery stores are off limits to people lacking 'the Mark', the NWO people cannot have people turning to live stock, you bad farm animals!  One butchered cow can keep one adult fed for around a year.  A living animal is a marvel in many ways, but from a carnivores standpoint, a cow can keep about a year's worth of beef fresh as a daisy whether it's very hot out or very cold out.  You don't need refrigeration so long as the animal is alive.  The flesh, milk, butter, cream, sour cream, cottage cheeses, regular hard type cheese can all come from a healthy living cow or goat or sheep. That is too much food security for the 'useless eaters' to possess at such a time as when it is deemed the right time in history to ...shall we say 'reduce human population for the welfare of the planet, but really for the benefit of the surviving elite'?  Animals must be vilified, reduced greatly in number if a great percentage of the non-useful population is to be killed off, and there exist certain people and groups who have the insane notion that Earth's human population should be reduced, and they are the wise cabal who best know how to do that...as well as the group that ought to be left alive and in charge when it is all said and done!  What shall be their fabricated pretext for removing edible animals ahead of their planned kill off of a great fraction of mankind?  Oh, oh, oh!!!  I know!  It just came to me:  the high volume of methane flatulence that farm animals produce!!!  Their farts are deadly!  Dangerous!  A destroyer of worlds!!!  We must make them a thing of the past, or lacking that, alter, corrupt and/or befoul your human flesh using modifications on the farm animals at the chromosome level so that animals can possibly sicken and help get rid of the 'useless eaters' through that means one day. 

     But if they weren't going with the cow farts story they would just find another  The wolf finds a reason for taking the lamb. 

     The Global Climate Catastrophe Fraudsters are a group of mentally ill God deniers.  They've never saved a  planet...not any planet...not even one  They would have no idea how to save this planet even if it needed it.  God is pretty firmly in charge of things such as the functioning of the planet and so He can squeeze by without their ever so valuable insights anyway.  (That said, care for our wonderful planet is a great thing, and a sign of grateful stewardship.   Unfortunately, with the global elitist climate cabal, it's all a smokescreen for the devil's plans.  Do animal lovers wear all leather?  Do anti-racists walk around in KKK clothing?  Do people on fire with concern for the ecology zoom around in private planes or in huge yachts, live in massive mansions and have several other homes elsewhere, eat gourmet foods and own fast cars, etc.?)

     Scientist assure us of their brilliance and believability though their story about how things work changes very frequently.  But I believe that nearly every common person can tell when a story is held together with contradictory lies and pre-rehearsed group head nods.  The planet isn't dying...but they hope truth and common sense are.  The Molech worshiping baddies behind the global climate cabal are trying to make sure of it.   

 

     Do we have more large animals that emit flatulence than ever before because of the stock we raise?  Highly doubtful, I would conjecture.  Maybe there was more methane being emitted in past times than now.  The bison herds, the prehistoric animals that once mingled with most of today's animal species...there were numerous animal life, larger type animals, at one time.  We just don't know exactly how many.  But if the fossil beds of Karoo, South Africa are any indicator, then wow.  There were many billions of beasts.  Check it out because it's hard to believe, but some estimates say the Karoo fossil beds alone may hold 800 billion fossils.  That was no typo...800 billion.  Some sources say the Karoo fossil beds cover many 10's of thousands of square miles.  There are small creatures in these beds, but many large creatures as well...plenty of 4 and 6 and 10 feet long creatures.  And that is only one, single, very large fossil bed.  There are other locations which also hold vast deposits of fossilized animals.  How much methane did those animals produce without it 'destroying the Earth from over-fartification'? 

 

     Some say that we presently have 1.5 billion cattle on the Earth, 1.2 billion sheep, 1 billion pigs,  1.1 billion goats, 60 million horses (not so many of those, surprisingly!) and 42 million camels.  Those numbers, those estimated animal populations, probably not very accurate, add up to under 5 billion of those animals living at the present time.  Enough to feed all of humanity for about 1 month perhaps, if it were evenly distributed as meat.  Sheep, pigs and goats are quite a lot smaller than a cow and be consumed pretty quickly.  That's a pretty big number though, yet it pales in comparison to the number of animals in the Karoo fossil beds, and that is only one of a good number of large scale fossil deposits from around the world.  Though Karoo is apparently a whopper, here is a list from AI of other very significant fossil deposits, and very, very many smaller deposits, sometimes of fairly large animals who probably produced large volumes of methane, though more often of marine animals or smaller animals.  A quote:

 

• Morrison Formation
   (North America): One of the most fertile sources of dinosaur fossils in North America, covering vast areas across several US states and producing iconic species like Stegosaurus and Brontosaurus.
• Dinosaur Provincial Park
   (Canada): A UNESCO World Heritage site known for its rich and diverse dinosaur fauna and vast bone beds.
• Chinle Group
   (USA): Covers large portions of the American Southwest and provides a detailed record of Late Triassic life, including early dinosaurs and other tetrapods.
• Burgess Shale
   (Canada): Renowned for its exceptional preservation of soft-bodied marine organisms from the Cambrian period, offering insights into the "Cambrian explosion".

     End quote from A.I.

         

 

     What about people themselves?  Do we emit more gas from our own bodies if we eat a meal of meat, or of vegetables?  Here's an A.I. response on that question:

 

     "Human gut: The breakdown of meat, while not a direct source of methane in the human body, can still contribute to overall digestive gas. However, diets with high amounts of vegetables and other high-fiber foods can produce more gas in humans."  End quote.

 

     So that's one data point, right?  Once the food is in a human stomach (and there are 8 billion of us humans who are also contributors to the planet's atmospheric methane loading, right?) a vegetable meal produces more methane inside of the human digestive tract than a meat meal.  By the way, it is very hard to get AI to answer this question.  It has apparently been programmed very rigidly to keep pretending that you want to know if the animal, in their lifetime, will cause more emissions on our Earth than if we just grew Plant Kingdom crops and directly ate those crops instead of raising edible animals. 

 

     All of the sources I looked at agreed that once the food was in your human tummy, meat produced less gas than vegetables.  Score one for meat!

 

     Do the rich, high faluting jet-setter New World Order folks intend to eat oatmeal and kale to save the planet, will they wistfully stick to munching a stalk of celery for the welfare of mother Earth as they blast around in their private jets of plow the seas in their super-yachts, living in two, three, or five homes?  Or will they only eat lab-grown meat and vegetables?  Or will they sneak in the 'whatever the heck they want anytime they want it' option when it comes to their own food consumption?  We know the answer.  We definitely know that answer.  I don't personally care about their jets or yachts...it's their money.  Most of them are very hard workers from what I've seen.  People can largely decide how to enjoy their money, right?  But announcing in unison from their mighty New World Order brains that cow-farts are the next planetary crisis?  I want to hope that there is not enough ridiculous propaganda or gullible common folk brains on the face of God's green Earth to convince the public of that!  What ridiculous dumbness.  (people who say 'dumbness' are exhibiting dumbness, I acknowledge.)

 

     Humor nugget.  Here is a small saving grace:  if our atmosphere really is filling up with the farts of farm animals, then we will begin to go 'nose deaf' to the smell of farts as our brains increasingly recognize the need to screen out that distractor, the smell of farts, so that more important scents can be recognized.  Every animal or human fart will come to seem less powerful and annoying.  And the Satanic elites want to steal this little blessing from us!  

 

     How much research has gone into producing something along the lines of a large scale 'Beano', the liquid that people can buy and sprinkle on their food to reduce human gas?  It is often added to beans, hence the name, I believe.  Any options there?  Could that save our planet?  If we are ever forced to treat this methane charade with even a shred of seriousness, we ought to start  with foods that reduce methane gas emissions from our stock, maybe.  (I can almost hear the farmers rolling their eyes.  Sorry!)

 

     In dryer lands the people almost literally need animals to turn the scarce plant life into something that can make food.  In a lot of Earth's arid lands the stock is more a necessity than an option or a luxury.  Those people, like all people, matter to Jesus.  Their lives happen to heavily revolve around animals.  

 

     There are many side benefits to vegetarian grazing farm stock animals.  They keep weeds knocked down some and eaten back.  The depressions from the hoofs of herd animals press seeds down into the dirt, and also the hoof prints fill with water like a tiny pond when it rains, providing plants with small 'wetter spots' in dry lands.  The grass and native plants have an increased chance of getting enough moisture to live and grow to maturity.  Bugs and other small creatures also can get a drink from a hoof print full of water.  This war against farm animals because they fart is simply too silly to be the NWO's actual thrust when they speak of stock animals as an existential threat.  I personally believe they know that people will rebel against any forced population reduction, and they want to take away options that would help the people hold out against such an evil agenda.  I can't convince myself that they are dumb enough to literally be concerned about cows farting.  It truly brings silliness to a new level. 

 

     What about the recently ended 'age of horses', which sort of ground to a halt in the 1920's and 1930's ?  Before cars there were so many more horses.  Horses definitely pass gas in impressive volumes, yet the Earth spun pretty well through it all.  The methane scam is an engineered fraud I believe.  There's just no way that so many relatively smart people can be pushing so patently ludicrous of a notion.

 

     What about the oxen that pulled the plow or the wagon?  There were a very great number of those that are now absent.        

 

     The manure of farm animals adds richness to the soil and is food for many insects which in turn are food for many other creatures...we all know a little about the cycles of life.  Also, every leather product is taking the place of a possible plastic product.  There can be advantages to that, as we all know.       

 

     What about safe little auto-igniters that could be clipped high up on the animals tail.  Solar powered ones, maybe.  "Tough on bulls, easy on planets."  There has to be some sales pitch or another that will draw the farmers and ranchers in, convince them to start using the product. 

 

     The big picture is this:  right now we may be able to preemptively legislate a lot of this wicked silliness out of ever existing.  A banning or reduction of farm animals?  We could preemptively put any such law off limits.  We could put an end to genetically modified meats, and should.  Other foresightful and wise nations already have or are actively pursuing such bans on fake meats.  In the USA this RFK guy is looking pretty smart about such things to me most of the time.  We should maybe look at saying, "If you can't embed the 'quality' you wish to instill in an animal through the discriminating forces designed into the natural breeding process, then you have to do without it."  If nature weeds out a quality that you imagine is desirable, that's a powerful sign that the quality has significant drawbacks.  God Almighty designed nature.  He probably foresaw that we'd try to breed things to our best advantage, but as far as toying directly with the microscopic fundamentals of each creature's structure...that is most likely an unwise move in nearly all cases.  

 

     We definitely don't want animals portrayed as villains by the New World Order and their bought-and-paid-for Scientific hucksters.  Let as many creatures be born and raised as the market can handle.  No goal of the New World Order is likely to ever be formed for the welfare of us, the useless eaters.  Once, all of this sounded too much like wild eyed conspiracy theory.  But those more innocent times are gone. 

 

     We have legislators.  We need to be calling them, writing them or meeting with them now.  Some countries have already tried to put stops on the war against farm animals and the corruption of their genetics.  I sometimes suspect that this is one of the great sins of the time before the Great Flood...corrupting the DNA of various creatures.  Angels were on Earth, and they are hugely intelligent from what we know, though far more likely overall to be obedient to God than humans are.   But the countries which have not already begun to oppose the war on food and animals better look at the matter with great seriousness.  The forces trying to push this agenda are not the buddy, not the pal, not the fan of the common man.  To them, the uncelebrated and run of the mill common man and woman are creatures taking up space on THEIR planet.  And above that, in the final analysis, there is a war on the spiritual plane where the followers of Jesus (predominantly poor and undistinguished people, mostly not well connected politically) constitute a problem that the followers of Satan need to eliminate if they are to please their wicked, power hungry, deceitful and rebellious lord.  As Ephesians 6:12 puts it:

 

     ¹² For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.

 

     End quote.

 

     Oppose evil!  Do it, discuss it at church, and teach your significant others to do it.  We ignore how lucky we are to be able to vote out evil laws and people.  No wonder the Democrat/Liberal/New World Order has attacked the integrity of our voting with such criminal persistence.  They want a world where evil cannot be voted out.